## Area of Circle (another perspective)

Posted: February 20, 2016 in Area, Calculus: An Introduction, Integral Calculus
Tags: , ,

Polar coordinates are not formally introduced in high school, yet sector area is required to prove fundamental trigonometric limits. Having already seen that proof, it wouldn’t be all that painful for students to see circle area derived through the limiting process as applied to angles.

I’ve included another scenario below, this time with variable radius as well.

Explore changing polar coordinates here.

Connect your understanding of polar coordinates to that of cylindrical coordinates.

## Volume of Sphere (shells and slabs)

Posted: February 19, 2016 in Calculus: An Introduction, Shell Method, Volumes of Revolution
Tags: , ,

Displayed below are two familiar methods of determining volumes of solids, this time as applied to the sphere. It is beneficial to compare two (or more) methods of determining volumes of a given solid; this allows students to develop a deeper understanding of each process that might not otherwise occur if kept in isolation from one another. It is also beneficial to compare directly each method as applied to different shapes. I’m including a link to volume of cones here for that purpose.

## Differential Equations (comparisons)

Posted: February 19, 2016 in Differential Equations, Integral Calculus
Tags: ,

Having side-by-side comparisons can be valuable experience as similarities (and differences)  are more readily apparent; students can gain a deeper understanding of the nuances from one to the next. For example, its worth noting that the rate of change of a circle’s area with respect to its radius is equal to that circle’s circumference; a similar relationship exists between the volume and surface area of a sphere.

Investing some thought into these and other subtleties can go a long way towards increasing one’s intuitive feel for, and enjoyment of this discipline.

Another comparison worth checking out is quadratic vs exponential growth.

## The Integral

Posted: February 19, 2016 in Integral Calculus
Tags:

Reference

Courant, Richard., John, Fritz (1999).  Introduction to Calculus and Analytics: Classics of Mathematics. New York, NY:  Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

## Area Problem Involving e^x and ln(y)

Posted: February 18, 2016 in Area, Integral Calculus, The Derivative
Tags: ,

For the past week or so, we’ve been focused primarily on differential calculus and becoming comfortable with the rules that have been derived through the limiting process. The derivatives of e^x and ln(x) were both derived but only the anti-derivative of the former reveals itself through that process. Since the primitive of ln(x) remains a mystery, only the first part of the exploration below can be tackled.

In order to facilitate completion of the entire sequence below, I will ask the students to determine the derivative of f(x)=-x+xln(x). The result will be very useful for our purposes here and will also launch us into Integration by Parts.

## Volume of Cone (new perspective)

Posted: February 17, 2016 in Calculus: An Introduction, Integral Calculus, Volume, Volumes of Revolution
Tags: ,

I’m snooping around multi-variable calculus with this entry. Presentation of this in class will depend on circumstances (time and where students are). I will nevertheless post a link to this on Google classroom and let students explore if they so desire.

Explore the volume of a cone from a different perspective.

Check out volume of pyramid as well.

Thanks for looking.

## Trigonometric- and u-substitution

Posted: February 17, 2016 in Area, Calculus: An Introduction, Integral Calculus, Trigonometric Substitution
Tags: , , ,

When working with composite functions, u-substitution often simplifies the integration process for us. What is sometimes overlooked, however, is the significant adjustment that occurs to the area beneath the curve.  The image and link below allow students to explore the significance of this procedure.

Interactively explore u-substitution.

As seen below, u-substitution is not a viable approach to integration as its leads to division by zero. In the case below, and others like it, trigonometric substitution provides a means for us to move forward and solve many problems. The process below also brings trigonometric identities into play, thereby  exposing students to their significance.

## Area of Circle (Uniform Sub-Intervals)

Posted: February 16, 2016 in Area, Calculus: An Introduction, Integral Calculus, Riemann Sums
Tags: , ,

As I’ve stated before, circle area would once again be investigated. This iteration brings uniform sub-intervals into play (apologies for all the color but thought it would be helpful for students to distinguish upper and lower bounds).  The link directly below this image opens a new tab from which students can adjust two parameters to explore the partitions; those sliders appear at the right-hand side near the bottom.

In the image above, there are two rectangles displayed; the length of the blue rectangle is based on the circumference of the upper bound, the length of the red on the lower bound. By reducing the width of each partition (link below), you will see that these two lengths approach a common value.

Interactive exploration of the image directly above.

For a direct comparison between this version and that using non-uniform partitions, I’ve added the image below.

One final note here: Area of the circle using annuli of uniform sub-intervals extends naturally to volumes by cylindrical shells. Walls extend perpendicular to the upper and lower bounds of each annulus; the height of these walls is governed by a function of “x” (single variable calculus). For f(x)=c, the layering effect of cylindrical shells forms a cylindrical solid. For f(x)=ax+c, the solid formed is a cone, if f(x)=ax^2+b, a paraboloid emerges. These are a reasonable conclusions that high school students readily accept. Volumes by slabs follow the same argument.

Cylindrical Shells

I also like to have students set up integrals from both dx & dy perspectives (as seen below).

## Leveraging a, v, and s

Posted: February 16, 2016 in Integral Calculus
Tags: ,

I, like most others, always attempt to use students’ existing knowledge base on which to build and connect new concepts (or new perspectives on old concepts); simple motion problems are one such example. The concept in this entry is integration and it provides a new and very rich perspective on an “old” concept already familiar to students.

The following excerpt is taken from reflections of my 1st two weeks in calculus.
Question: What can we do when “dv=(a)dt” shows up in this way?
Question: What does integration give us?
Answer: The area between the function and the x-axis.
Question: What does our function represent?
Question: What does the area in question represent?
Question: Have you ever seen this before and, if so, where?

As an extra activity, students could sketch slope fields for dv/dt and ds/dt to become more familiar with those. In addition, students would also benefit from drawing comparisons between integrating functions in 2-dimensions above (focus on area) and its 3-dimensional counterpart.

## Reflecting on 1st Two Weeks of Calculus

Posted: February 13, 2016 in Calculus: An Introduction, Differential Calculus, Integral Calculus
Tags:

First Week

Day 1
The branch of mathematics called “calculus” was defined as the “mathematics of change”. A discussion of the movement of a point residing on the Earth’s equator and the corresponding position function was determined. Slopes of this function at the critical points were determined, interpreted and compared to a second function (derivative of the displacement function). With the help of technology to determine slopes, connections quickly became apparent between rates of change of the displacement function with respect to time and the value of the second function. Students immediately wanted to know more and were informed that they would soon learn an efficient method of determining rates of change.

Buffon’s experiment was also recreated and an estimate for π emerged. I mentioned to students that the reasoning behind this method will be constructed by the middle of March (π week). Students were also informed that probability and calculation of areas would be required to meet this challenge.

The two branches of calculus had now been introduced within the first 40 minutes of our 80 minute block. Following a very brief discussion of what Newton and Leibniz contributed to mathematics, the students were primed to further investigate either branch.
It was decided that we would spend the remainder of our class time investigating the volume of a cone. The formula for sum of triangular numbers was quickly determined; this was followed by a more lengthy derivation of the formula for sums of squares (using telescoping sums). With these in place, a linear function having slope r/h was drawn through the origin. I asked the students to imagine what shape would emerge if we could rotate that line around the x-axis; a cone was visualized and notion of volumes of revolution introduced. I quickly sketched a cross-sectional slab of thickness ∆x; this cylindrical slab was duplicated away from the cone and its volume was quickly identified. Discussion ensued with respect to similar cross-sectional slabs cut from other positions on the cone; students immediately noticed that the radius varied and was governed by the linear function f(x)=(r/h)x.

Students quickly agreed that by calculating volumes of individual slabs and summing (integrating) those on the interval [0, h], a reasonable estimate for the cone’s volume should emerge. Uniform sub-intervals of length ∆x=(h/n) were then established and recorded on the white board. Students accepted the idea that if “n” were to increase without bound, the cylindrical slabs would become increasingly narrow and the estimate for the cone’s volume would become more precise.

It was then decided that the radius of each slab “f(x)” could be based on the upper bound of each sub-interval (since all values of ” x ” from there to the lower bound become infinitely close to one-another as “n” increases without bound). Following some factoring, an appropriate substitution of the sum of squares formula and evaluation of limits as “n” moves to an infinitely large value, the well-known formula for volume of the cone appeared; minds blown (in a good way).

We will soon turn the cone onto its base and calculate volume by horizontal slabs (as shown directly below) and eventually by cylindrical shells (lower image).

Horizontal Slabs

Cylindrical Shells

Later in the week, the power rule for integral calculus was derived using Fermat’s non-uniform sub-intervals as shown in the image below; the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus was also established at this point. The cone’s volume was once again derived by adding volumes of slabs sliced from uniform sub-intervals. Students now discovered that these discrete volumes (Riemann sums) gave way to their continuous counterpart (Integral). Applying the power rule of integration to π((r/h) x)^2 and evaluating the result over the interval [0, h] using the FTC quickly produced the desired formula. The integral notation was adopted soon thereafter.

Fermat’s Non-Uniform  Partitions

The time remaining over the final two days of Week 1 primarily involved students setting up and evaluating integrals; primitives of functions for which the power rule did not work were provided as the assignment given included those as well. The primitives of these functions will later be determined and defined further as anti-derivatives through the use of differential calculus.

Second Week

Day 1

A review of the previous week’s topic was followed by the introduction of rates of change. The introduction of a new topic always involves discussion and students are asked to avoid note-taking; engagement in discussion, diagrams and analysis is maximized in this way. What is learned on day 1 will be summarized with carefully scripted notes the following day (discussion is always included here as well for clarification when needed).

The function f(x)=x^2 was used initially with a secant line drawn between two distinct points P and Q. An expression for the slope of this line (average rate of change) was determined for “x” and “(x+∆x)”. A right triangle was then sketched and the slope of the line segment PQ was related to the tangent ratio of the angle formed at point P. It was then determined that the tangent line at P would become the limiting case of secant PQ (since ∆x can never be zero). A direct comparison to points of discontinuity from Math 30 was also made here. We will discuss left- and right-hand limits to determine whether or not a function is differentiable at a given point later on this semester; it is an unnecessary distraction at this point.

Preceding the delivery of my notes on day 2, the drill from the previous day was repeated, this time with f(x)=x^3. When comparing the results from the two functions, a pattern seemed to have emerged. Having seen this limiting process twice, the notes on differential calculus would now have some meaning to students. The term “derivative” was introduced and shown that it is itself a function. Various notations of the derivative were also introduced here (Leibniz, Lagrange, Newton) as were numerical representations. Several examples of f'(x) and f'(a) were worked through in class together and then time given for students to practice.

When students need a break from practice, I give them something new to think about. On day 3, we brought some simple physics into play. Students already know that acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with respect to time; dv/dt=a. Since they learned simple differential equations in week one, the equation above was re-written as dv=(a)dt.

The following exchange ensued:
Question: What can we do when “dv=(a)dt” shows up in this way?
Question: What does integration give us?
Answer: The area between the function and the x-axis.
Question: What does our function represent?
Question: What does the area in question represent?
Question: Have you ever seen this before and, if so, where?
Comment: Now you know why Newton invented calculus!

Getting back to our differential equation…….
The process of integration above resulted in v=at+v_0.
We then executed the same process once again, this time for ds/dt=v.

Through the integration of ds=(at+v_0)dt, the displacement function encountered so many times in Math 20-1 (and Physics 20) appeared.

s=(a/2) t^2+(v_0) t+s_0

This happens very quickly and gets students thinking. It also brings back the topic of integration and sets up very nicely the inverse relationship between derivatives and integrals.

Other “extras” that were thrown in during week 2:
-Chain Rule using Leibniz notation and “u”substitution.
-proof of fundamental trig limits
-derivative of sin(x) through algebraic analysis and graphing

Additional information given but not yet derived:
-product rule: d(fg)=f’g+g’f
-quotient rule: d(f/g)=(f’g-g’f))/g^2
– d/dx ln(x)=1/x

– d /dx cos(x)=-sin(x)……this was reasoned out using graphs.

Upcoming:
-derivatives of ln(x),e^x,cos(x) and proofs of product & quotient rules using logarithms.

-setting up and solving simple differential equations from slope fields

-further analysis of significance of chain rule as it applies to derivatives AND integrals. This analysis will occur both geometrically and analytically.

-linear regression using method of least squares.

By the end of February, students will be quite fluent in setting up and solving simple problems involving derivatives and basic integrals. Further work with limits and curve sketching will be done later in the semester and will seem trivial by that time.

It is clear from this entry that I am a “constructivist”. I realize that some proponents of discovery learning will hammer on me for this; that is fine. There is still plenty of room in this approach for students to explore and discover connections on their own. Differentiation and integration are tools for other pursuits, not an end in themselves. This not meant to insult high school math students but it would take them much longer than 2 weeks to be in the position we presently find ourselves.

Between now and the end of this semester, we will continue to explore circle area, cone volume, arc length, etc. and through those pursuits, trigonometric substitution, integration by parts and partial fractions will eventually emerge; the proof of Buffon’s needle experiment in the middle of March will seem anti-climactic. Logistic growth, work, centers of mass in 1- & 2-dimensions, and other more complex applications of calculus will also be pursued and tackled.

That’s all I have to say for now.